|
by Curtis M. Pearsall, Vice President, Agents' Errors and Omissions Department In the current state of the market, more often than not, carriers are adding new exclusions to their policies. A couple of years ago, it was Y2K. Now exclusions for exposures such as mold and terrorism are being included on accounts as they renew. As the agent for that customer, have you ever wondered what your responsibility is for advising your client in a situation where one of your carriers has placed a new exclusion (for the sake of this article, let's use mold) on your customer's renewal policy while other carriers in your office have not?
Obviously, each situation is different and the law of a particular state needs to be factored in. In general, there is a duty on the part of the carrier and agent to advise the client of a coverage reduction. The carrier has the prime responsibility because they are making the change and typically some type of conditional renewal notice would be in order. The agent would be responsible if there was knowledge of the change or if the agency received the policy for review before sending it on to the client. In most situations, the agent should tell (not just recommend) the client of other companies available without the exclusion. The information should be provided in writing, providing a specimen policy and requesting the client's reply. It would be advisable to check with those other companies to find out what their plans are for this new exclusion.
As with most E&O issues, communication and documentation are the main keys. I can't guarantee that you won't get hit with an E&O claim, but the defense that is provided will be strengthened if you have done the right thing by professional communication and solid documentation. Communiqué is published for our agent-customers for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, nor should it be relied upon as legal advice. Legal questions should be directed to your legal advisor. |